Fall Month: 3 
Night 
Hurricane Moon: 
| Chatbox |
| Boeing |
| Aestralis That's a fair point Earnable currency is losing it's value kind of That's called proper inflation xD |
| Aestralis |
| Amy True! But either way, the update has increased the Mush Supply, |
| Revelry |
| enigma I was in a allie that had almost 70 apples from wow. Only saw like 5 of it, but the leader took like 40 for themselves cuz they needed premium to keep th allie active... |
| Enigma |
| I forgot to account for the fact nobody is exploring on a large scale anymore so less mush to go around |
| Boeing |
| Enigma We just need a consistent supplier of apples really at this point lol I don't care if it's a monopoly, we just need something like that to regulate the economy Like the Reserve Bank of England does with gold xD |
| Amygdala |
| Aestrails Yes but at the same time a lot of people lost interest in explore from the updates...i barelly fo 1 lever per week now so more mush from minigames is my only source of income lately XD |
| Aestralis |
| Boe The other thing to consider is that mush is becomin less valueable over time. Look at the update to Mushroom Hunt to increase it's prize values. As it gets easier to acquire Mush, They are less able to purchase items with fluctuating prices, ie Apples, CP, and event Currency. |
| Enigma |
| @Rev Agreed, I do think that the packs that pull the most weight during WoW should get to say what happens to the apples that are won @Boe *^* that and higher player base means more competition among sellers, so lower prices |
| Boeing |
| Amt Well yeah Both curves would shift to the right so there'd be more people buying and more people selling Bu that's assuming more people sell :'D And I apologize for spewing economics into chat- |
| Amygdala |
| Plane Yes but considering there would be more people also selling the apples and more people buying the apples shouldn't it stay roughly the same? |
| {~Wispy~Wolves~} |
| All this makes my brain hurt. its a game it shouldn't be this complicated XD |
| Boeing |
| Amt No but if more people buy apples then the demand curve increases significantly Assume supply at whatever value we have a the moment stays constant. Demand increases like you say There's a shortage because more people demand it than there is supply. People bid up the price to get apples, or are willing to pay a higher price. Suppliers see that people want more and increase the price. Result => apples now cost more money |
| Quests |
| Alliance Battles |
| Challenges |
 | Red Fox : -1 |
| Leopard : -4 |
| Red Fox : -1 |
| Chatbox |
| Boeing |
| Aestralis That's a fair point Earnable currency is losing it's value kind of That's called proper inflation xD |
| Aestralis |
| Amy True! But either way, the update has increased the Mush Supply, |
| Revelry |
| enigma I was in a allie that had almost 70 apples from wow. Only saw like 5 of it, but the leader took like 40 for themselves cuz they needed premium to keep th allie active... |
| Enigma |
| I forgot to account for the fact nobody is exploring on a large scale anymore so less mush to go around |
| Boeing |
| Enigma We just need a consistent supplier of apples really at this point lol I don't care if it's a monopoly, we just need something like that to regulate the economy Like the Reserve Bank of England does with gold xD |
| Amygdala |
| Aestrails Yes but at the same time a lot of people lost interest in explore from the updates...i barelly fo 1 lever per week now so more mush from minigames is my only source of income lately XD |
| Aestralis |
| Boe The other thing to consider is that mush is becomin less valueable over time. Look at the update to Mushroom Hunt to increase it's prize values. As it gets easier to acquire Mush, They are less able to purchase items with fluctuating prices, ie Apples, CP, and event Currency. |
| Enigma |
| @Rev Agreed, I do think that the packs that pull the most weight during WoW should get to say what happens to the apples that are won @Boe *^* that and higher player base means more competition among sellers, so lower prices |
| Boeing |
| Amt Well yeah Both curves would shift to the right so there'd be more people buying and more people selling Bu that's assuming more people sell :'D And I apologize for spewing economics into chat- |
| Amygdala |
| Plane Yes but considering there would be more people also selling the apples and more people buying the apples shouldn't it stay roughly the same? |
| {~Wispy~Wolves~} |
| All this makes my brain hurt. its a game it shouldn't be this complicated XD |
| Boeing |
| Amt No but if more people buy apples then the demand curve increases significantly Assume supply at whatever value we have a the moment stays constant. Demand increases like you say There's a shortage because more people demand it than there is supply. People bid up the price to get apples, or are willing to pay a higher price. Suppliers see that people want more and increase the price. Result => apples now cost more money |
