|

Administrator Lightbringer
|
The reason for the cap is to prevent the market from being flooded with talents.
|
|
|
|

Neutral
|
Not sure how talents are calculated (obviously) but maybe we can find a middle ground and exponentially decrease the talent inhereitance rate for super-high talented wolves. So for wolves under say 500T, it'll be buffed, but as you get into Buffy 1000T territory, it acts like it does now. That way we can have super-high talent wolves without them flooding the market.
|
|
|
|

Darkseeker
|
Red River Wolves said: Not sure how talents are calculated (obviously) but maybe we can find a middle ground and exponentially decrease the talent inhereitance rate for super-high talented wolves. So for wolves under say 500T, it'll be buffed, but as you get into Buffy 1000T territory, it acts like it does now. That way we can have super-high talent wolves without them flooding the market. Voted "Other" specifically because of this. I like the idea of a more "natural" cap better than a hard cap. Keeps high talent wolves valueable while still technically providing an endless grind to make better and better wolves
|
|
|
|

Neutral
|
Ok I have a question. If you had a male and female at 100 talents. Would the pups have a small chance of being a 100or over? Or do you still have to use a breading item? I know it's probably a dumb question but I have to ask lol
|
|
|
|

Administrator Lightbringer
|
They could be over 100, but it's unlikely in the current system.
|
|
|